Class in Session: A History in Classification

July 24, 2017

By Rob Kaminski
MHSAA benchmarks editor

This is the first part in a series on MHSAA tournament classification, past and present, that will be published over the next two weeks. This series originally ran in this spring's edition of MHSAA benchmarks.

Conversation and discussion at the March 2017 MHSAA Representative Council Meeting leaned heavily toward the subject of 8-Player Football and how to properly balance its tournament with the growing number of schools sponsoring the sport.

While the proposal to split the tournament into two divisions beginning with the 2017 school year was adopted, the MHSAA then faced questions such as when to set the divisions, how to determine qualifiers and where to host the championship games.

The topic continues to create a buzz in Class D schools across both peninsulas, and likely will do into the start of school this fall.

Likewise, the lone holdouts still conducting tournaments by class – MHSAA Boys and Girls Basketball and Girls Volleyball – took center stage at the May Council discussion, and following the 2017-18 school year, class is out for good. Both genders of basketball, and girls volleyball, will move to divisional formats thereafter.

There is much to be decided to be sure; but as those in education are well aware, history is the best teacher.

Fortunately for the sports in flux and for all sports under the governance of the MHSAA, the Association more or less wrote the book on the subject of sport classification. Following is a history lesson, with a little advanced division thrown in.

Class structure

Credited with being the first state with multiple tournament classifications, Michigan’s attention to trends and shifts in philosophy aimed at fair play and equal tournament opportunity can be traced from 80 years ago to the present.

In the earliest years of the MHSAA, there were four classifications for elections and tournaments –  Classes A, B, C and D. Classes C and D had far more schools than Classes A and B. For example, 80 years ago (1937), there were only 58 schools in Class A, 94 schools in Class B, 297 schools in Class C and 253 schools in Class D.

Gradually through the years, as Michigan’s major cities spawned suburbs, there was a shift in the other direction to the point 30 years ago (1987) when school size became more balanced: 173 Class A schools, 178 Class B schools, 179 Class C schools and 182 Class D schools.

Up until 1987, the MHSAA published the dividing line between each classification, after which schools submitted their enrollments. Then, for 1988 and thereafter, the MHSAA adopted the plan of gathering all enrollments first and then placing 25 percent of the schools in each of four classes. This completed the equalization of the number of schools in each class for elections.

However, the change for 1988 did nothing to equalize the number of teams actually entered by each class in each sport. And unlike the early years of the Association when there were many more Class C and D teams than A and B teams, there were more Class A and B teams than C and D teams entering MHSAA tournaments decades later.

Moreover, the difference in number of teams entered in the different classifications for a sport continued to increase as many small schools, the fastest growing portion of the MHSAA's membership, sponsor only a few sports, or they sponsor no sports at all but enter into cooperative programs with other schools.

Because of these differences, Class A or B schools sometimes had to win twice as many games as Class C or D schools to reach the MHSAA Finals in a sport. At times, the larger classifications had District Tournaments, even rat-tail games, and/or a Quarterfinal game, and the smaller classifications did not. Most Class D Districts have had four teams (some only three), while Class A Districts often had seven or eight teams. In Regional levels of individual sports, the number of entries in the larger classification once greatly outnumbered those in the smaller classifications of the tournament for the same sport.

Over the years, these dividing lines between classes escalated gradually, as did the differences in enrollments of largest and small schools in each class. In 1937 the dividing lines were 700, 300 and 100 between Class A and B, B and C, and C and D, respectively. By 1987, the dividing lines were 1,129, 571 and 298, respectively, leading to the current method of collecting enrollments and then setting the classification.

With the pendulum swinging well past center by the late 1980s, coaches associations, MHSAA sport committees, tournament managers and school administrators began discussion and offered proposals to correct what many believed had become a flawed system of MHSAA tournament classification.

At the 1996 MHSAA Update Meetings, ¾ of 858 respondents to that year’s annual survey indicated they favored a system that would divide schools which actually sponsor each sport into two, three or four nearly equal divisions.

Problem solving

At its meeting May 4-6, 1997, the Representative Council defeated a motion that would have adopted in one action a coordinated plan of reclassification for all sports to equalize the number of schools in each tournament for each respective sport. Instead, the Council discussed and voted on each proposal that had been presented from sport committees.

This resulted in the Representative Council adopting four equal divisions for baseball and softball, four equal divisions for boys and girls tennis, four equal divisions for boys soccer and three equal divisions for girls soccer, effective with the 1997-98 school year. Helping in the decision was the success of the 1995-96 MHSAA Wrestling season, which saw the sport move to four divisions for its tournament structure

The Council delayed action on similar proposals for football and boys golf at that time to glean additional input. The same decision was made with respect to a proposal from the Ice Hockey Committee that would have split the Class A schools in two divisions and left the Class B/C/D Tournament unchanged.

“The gist of the move from classes to divisions was to equalize the path to championships for students of all schools, regardless of the size of those schools,” said MHSAA Executive Director Jack Roberts.

While the restructuring accomplished that goal for the majority of competitors, opposition exists now as it did then. The primary argument in opposition to the changes is that, in some sports, it increases the range between largest and smallest schools in the division for smallest schools, even as the range is usually reduced for other divisions.

Larger schools offered a counterpoint.

“The larger schools suggested that while they may have more students, they also attempt to sponsor more sports than the smaller schools, in some cases spreading the enrollment as thin as a much smaller school with fewer sports,” Roberts said.

“Even today, the idea of four equal divisions can be unpopular among some Class D schools which feel especially burdened by the equal division concept,” Roberts said. “There was enough opposition in 1997 that equal divisions were rejected for boys and girls basketball and girls volleyball, and some of that opposition remains.”

The numbers of schools sponsoring each MHSAA tournament are still close to the totals today, with the exception of soccer in both genders, which has enjoyed substantial increases. This spring, 466 girls teams were scheduled to compete in the MHSAA Soccer Tournament, while 473 boys teams will suit up this fall.

Since the beginning of MHSAA divisions in 1996 with wrestling, 147 additional team champions have been crowned and countless individuals have known the thrill of victory due to an extra level of Finals in various sports. Girls soccer has seen the most growth in opportunity, moving from two classes in 1987 to three divisions the following year, and then four divisions in 2000. Boys soccer had enjoyed four classes for two years prior to the new four-division format, and it was the sport of soccer that helped to create a caveat in the nearly equal division movement.

Lower Peninsula boys and girls swimming & diving expanded from two to three divisions in 2008, while boys and girls bowling are the most recent sports to enjoy increased tournament opportunity, adding a fourth division in 2010.

“Fairness is in the eye of the beholder. While having the same number of schools in each division is one kind of fairness, holding in check the enrollment range between the largest and smallest schools in Division 4 is another kind of fairness that is dear to a great number of people,” Roberts said. “Because more schools sponsor basketball and volleyball than other sports, Class D schools would have been least affected by the equal divisions concept in those sports; but that, and ‘tradition,’ did not dissuade the opponents in the 1990s.”

The shift to divisions not only paved the way for student-athletes, but also assisted administrators and schools hosting tournaments. MHSAA tournament mangers looked to equal divisions to more closely equalize the number of schools in District or Regional Tournaments and to better equalize the length of day required for these rounds of tournaments, both for management and participating teams and individuals.

Pinning down an answer

Wrestling became the first MHSAA Tournament to be conducted in nearly equal divisions when team and individual champions were crowned in Divisions 1, 2, 3 and 4 rather than Classes A, B, C/D for the 1996 winter championships. 

The movement was well received, as schools saw more opportunity for success: four champions where there once were three at the District, Regional and Final levels, and a smaller range of enrollment between the smallest and largest school in all four tournaments, leading to the impetus for the Fall 1996 Update Meeting Survey of schools regarding similar movement in other sports.

Team champions that year were Holt (D1), Petoskey (D2), Middleville Thornapple Kellogg (D3) and Dundee (D4).

Getting their kicks

When the "equal divisions" concept was approved by the Representative Council for most MHSAA Tournaments for the 1997-98 school year, there was opposition from the smallest schools which, under the equal divisions, are forced to play against larger schools than reside in Class D. Compelling arguments were made – and still are – that an enrollment difference between schools with smaller enrollments (e.g., Class D) is more difficult to overcome in athletic competition than an even larger enrollment difference between schools with larger enrollments (e.g., Class A).

The opposition was most intense in soccer because of the number of students needed to field a team and the physical nature of the sport. As a result, from 2000-01 through 2010-11, soccer operated with a “20-percent modification.” This placed 20 percent of all schools that actually sponsored soccer in Division 4, and the remaining 80 percent were placed equally in Divisions 1, 2 and 3.

At the time the 20 percent modification was adopted, it was also established that soccer would return to four equal divisions when the largest Division 4 soccer school had an enrollment equal to or smaller than the mid­ point for Class C schools. That occurred in 2010.

Last class on the schedule

In the same volume of “history being the best teacher,” one can also find the adage, “times change.” While the division format was a welcome change in some sports, others were left to hold class without change.

In the sports of boys and girls basketball, and girls volleyball, the number of schools sponsoring the sports were so close to the overall membership of the MHSAA that divisions were not necessary; the enrollment breakdowns themselves were enough to delineate equal opportunity for tournament success.

That is no longer the case, according to MHSAA membership. The last move from classes to divisions occurred for the 2006-07 school year following Council action. Before this May, that is. Action at the most recent Representative Council meeting, May 2017, called for the shift to divisions for MHSAA Boys and Girls Basketball, and Girls Volleyball, beginning with the 2018-19 season.

“Because the MHSAA Volleyball Committee had requested this change several times a number of years ago, and because the Council felt the change inevitable, there should not be further delay,” Roberts said. “It is an important detail that the Class D maximum has dropped 50 students over the past decade so the objection that much larger schools would be competing in Division 4 isn’t very strong now.”

Using the 2017-18 enrollment figures, just eight Class C schools would be competing in Division 4 for boys basketball, 11 for girls basketball and 14 for girls volleyball.

Good things came of the previous most-recent switches in 2006-07. Competitive Cheer was re-classified from Class A, B and C-D into four equal divisions assisting in the rapid growth of sponsoring schools (approximately 80 schools per division). Alpine skiing was changed from Class A and B-C­ D to two equal divisions.

At that time, the MHSAA Basketball Committee had recommended to the Council the study of increased classifications, but status quo remained.

Back on the grid

As such, MHSAA Basketball and Volleyball remained the only holdovers of the MHSAA class structure. Discussion resurfaced periodically during the last two decades to bring those tournaments in line with the other MHSAA sports.

Regular-season football-playing schools are separated by class, then are reshuffled by divisions for the playoffs. Football, as we know, underwent a significant postseason facelift in the late 1990s.

While MHSAA Football also remained a class sport through 1998, it had expanded from four to eight classes from 1990-98, becoming the first MHSAA sport to crown more than four team champions. Member schools were asked to consider a pair of options in November of 1997. One called for eight equal divisions, and the second would leave Class D by itself as division 8, and split Class A, B and C schools into seven nearly equal divisions.

After much discussion, retooling, and crunching of formulas, the MHSAA unveiled its revised Football Playoff model that continues to roll today, nearly 20 years later. It was determined that 256 teams would qualify for the tournament based first on a minimum of six wins, then by Playoff Points determined by formula. From there, the field would be divided into eight divisions, with the field being filled out by a nearly equal number of five-win teams in each division as needed to reach 256.

Eight championships would indeed be enough, until football sponsorship among the MHSAA’s smallest schools – some with rich football traditions – began to trend downward. The MHSAA again went to the drawing board, examining the viability of 8-player football. After an experimental year in 2010 without a tournament, the 8-player game was playoff-ready for 2011, with a field of 16 qualifiers embarking on a four-week tournament.

Not only did the 8-player option restore recently canceled programs, but it also created teams in schools which previously had none, and convinced some 11-player schools that this new division was the best path to take.

What did this do for the Class D holdovers staying in the traditional 11-player game? Well, a couple of things, positive and negative. As two and three dozen Class D schools opted for the 8-player game, the remaining 11-player Class D schools at times found themselves in disrupted leagues and had to travel further to complete schedules. They also competed against larger teams in Division 8 of the 11-player MHSAA Football Playoffs.

However, the growth of the 8-player game among the smallest schools also resulted in more Class D schools qualifying for the MHSAA Football Playoffs than ever before. In 2012, an all-time high 44 percent of Class D schools sponsoring football qualified for either the 8-player tournament or Division 8 of the 11-player tournament. That compared to 42.2 percent of Class C schools, 44.9 percent of Class B schools and 41.6 percent of Class A schools which qualified for the 2012 playoffs.

Much is to be determined in the most recent chapter of MHSAA Tournament expansion as the 8-Player Football Playoffs welcome a second division. As the past illustrates, there will be pluses and minuses. History also shows that the MHSAA has received maximum input from its constituents, researched all possibilities, and will find solutions to questions still in the balance before an additional group of athletes hoists a new trophy in November.

Through the Years

A chronology of when which sports moved from Class to Division in the MHSAA. 

1995-96: LP Wrestling

1997-98: Baseball, Boys Soccer, Girls Soccer, Softball, LP Girls Tennis, LP Boys Tennis

1998-99: LP Boys Golf, LP Girls Golf

1999-2000: Ice Hockey, LP Boys Track & Field, LP Girls Track & Field

2000-01: LP Boys Cross Country, LP Girls Cross Country, UP Boys Cross Country, UP Girls Cross Country, UP Boys Golf, UP Girls Golf, UP Boys Tennis, UP Girls Tennis, UP Boys Track & Field, UP Girls Track & Field

2002-03: LP Girls Swimming & Diving, LP Boys Swimming & Diving

2005-06: Boys Bowling, Girls Bowling

2006-07: Girls Competitive Cheer, Boys Skiing, Girls Skiing

2018-19: Boys Basketball, Girls Basketball, Girls Volleyball

Note: Boys and Girls Lacrosse has been a divisional sport since it began in during the 2004-05 school year.

Preview: Hockey Sets Stage for Favorites to Finish, Unexpected to Emerge

By Geoff Kimmerly
MHSAA.com senior editor

March 6, 2024

The MHSAA’s hockey championship weekend begins with expectations, as the final four teams in every division are seeded.

But we’re accustomed to a few surprises too during the Semifinals and Finals – and there are plenty of opportunities for both the anticipated and unpredicted to reign at USA Hockey Arena over the next three days.

All three divisions will welcome the top-ranked team at the end of the regular season, and two divisions will feature the No. 2 teams as well. All three divisions also have one unranked team in their respective fields – and don’t forget unranked East Grand Rapids reached the Division 3 championship game a year ago.

Similar to last winter as well, we also will have at least two new champions as last year’s Division 2 and 3 winners didn’t advance to this weekend. And while we’ll watch again some of the most accomplished champions in state history, seven of 12 teams playing this weekend are seeking to claim a title for the first time and three are seeking to make their championship game debut.

Division 1 – Friday
#1 Detroit Catholic Central (27-1) vs #4 Muskegon Reeths-Puffer (21-7) - 5 p.m.
#2 Brighton (23-4-1) vs #3 Clarkston (22-5-1) - 7:30 p.m.

Division 2 - Thursday
#1 Byron Center (25-2-1) vs #4 Saginaw Heritage (14-11) - 5 p.m.
#2 Trenton (22-4-2) vs #3 White Lake Lakeland (22-5-1) - 7:30 p.m.

Division 3 - Friday 
#1 Houghton (24-2-2) vs #4 Bloomfield Hills Cranbrook Kingswood (14-13-1) - 11 a.m.
#2 East Grand Rapids (23-5) vs #3 Traverse Bay Reps (18-8-2) - 1:30 p.m.

Saturday – Finals
Division 1 – 7 p.m.
Division 2 – 11 a.m.
Division 3 – 3 p.m.

All Semifinals and Finals will be streamed live on MHSAA.tv and viewable with subscription, with free audio broadcasts via the MHSAA Radio Network. For information on tickets and more, go to the Ice Hockey page – and see below for a glance at all 12 contenders, listed by seed.

Division 1

#1 DETROIT CATHOLIC CENTRAL
Record/rank: 27-1, No. 1
Coach: Brandon Kaleniecki, ninth season (218-30-2)
League finish: First in Michigan Interscholastic Hockey League White, Catholic High School League Bishop
Championship history: Seventeen MHSAA titles (most recent 2023), five runner-up finishes.

Best wins: 7-1 over No. 2 Brighton, 4-2 over No. 3 Hartland, 5-3 over No. 4 Clarkston, 8-0 over No. 6 Livonia Stevenson, 3-1 over Division 2 No. 1 Byron Center, 9-2 over Division 2 No. 2 Trenton, 2-1 over Division 3 No. 1 Houghton.
Players to watch: Peter Sanin, jr. F (19 goals, 16 assists); Brooks Rogowski, soph. F (19 goals, 24 assists); Jackson Walsh, sr. F (12 goals, 27 assists).
Outlook: The Shamrocks have run their Division 1 championship streak to four (not counting 2020, when Finals were canceled due to COVID-19) and lost this season only to Lake Forest Academy of Illinois. DCC has scored five or more goals in 20 games with nine players scoring at least six goals for the season. Seniors Nolan Galda (16 goals/18 assists), Cael Rogowski (15/19) and Sebastiano Iavasile (14/7) are among leading scorers as well, with Galda and Rogowski also among 11 players with double-digit assists this winter. Senior Mathieu Chernauckas (1.35 goals-against average, .934 save %) has played the most games in goal and is lined up to lead the team into the weekend.

#2 BRIGHTON
Record/rank: 23-4-1, No. 2
Coach: Kurt Kivisto, fourth season (77-23-5)
League finish: First in Kensington Lakes Activities Association West
Championship history: Five MHSAA titles (most recent 2018), four runner-up finishes.

Best wins: 4-3 (SO) and 3-1 over No. 4 Clarkston, 5-4 (SO) and 3-0 over No. 3 Hartland, 4-0 and 7-1 (Regional Final) over No. 8 Northville, 4-2 and 7-2 (Quarterfinal) over No. 6 Livonia Stevenson, 4-0 over No. 5 Howell, 7-0 over No. 9 Salem.
Players to watch: Cameron Duffany, sr. F (34 goals, 34 assists); Lane Petit, sr. F (35 goals, 19 assists); Levi Pennala, sr. G (1.61 GAA, .938 save %).
Outlook: Brighton has finished runner-up the last two seasons, and surely has been eyeing another matchup with DCC since their regular-season meeting, a 7-1 Bulldogs loss Dec. 9. Pennala made the all-state first team last season for the second straight and senior defenseman Ryan Watkins (4 goals/15 assists) made the second team in front of him, and they help key a defense that’s given up one or no goals in 16 games. Duffany and Petit also made the all-state first team last season, Duffany another repeat selection, and they are joined among the team’s leading scorers by freshman forward Tim Peterson (10/5) and senior forward Charlie Burchfield (9/16).

#3 CLARKSTON
Record/rank: 22-5-1, No. 4
Coach: Nathan Bryer, fourth season (56-36-5)
League finish: First in Oakland Activities Association Red
Championship history: Division 1 runner-up 2003.

Best wins: 5-2 over No. 3 Hartland in Regional Final, 7-4 over No. 5 Howell in Quarterfinal, 7-5 over No. 9 Salem, 4-0 over No. 6 Livonia Stevenson, 7-4 over Muskegon Reeths-Puffer.
Players to watch: Evan Adams, sr. D (2 goals, 21 assists); Ron Wade, jr. F (21 goals, 28 assists); Kyle Lynch, jr. F (14 goals, 23 assists).
Outlook: Clarkston has quickly climbed under Bryer, from sub-.500 records his first two seasons to this first trip to the Semifinals since 2008. It’s notable that all of the Wolves’ losses this season were by two goals or fewer to powerhouse teams – twice to Brighton, once to DCC and Division 2 No. 3 Bloomfield Hills Brother Rice, and once to Lake Forest Academy (Ill.). Wade made the all-state first team last season, and Adams and junior goalie Calum Hartner (1.71 GAA) made the second. Sophomore Brady Damian (1.82 GAA) has played the majority of the season in net and is expected to get the call this weekend. Senior Owen Croston (20 goals/15 assists) and sophomore Gavin Anderson (14/13) also are among top offensive contributors.

#4 MUSKEGON REETHS-PUFFER
Record/rank: 21-7, unranked
Coach: Dustin Langlois, first season (21-7)
League finish: Second in Ottawa-Kent Conference Fischer
Championship history: Has never played in an MHSAA Final.

Best wins: 5-2 and 6-2 (Regional Final) over No. 7 Sparta, 5-4 (OT) and 7-3 (Quarterfinal) over Grand Rapids Forest Hills Northern/Eastern, 6-4 over Grand Rapids Christian.
Players to watch: Connor Stawski, sr. D (6 goals, 14 assists); Jaxon Stone, sr. F (24 goals, 29 assists); Croix Klint, sr. F (17 goals, 15 assists).
Outlook: A group of eight seniors has led Reeths-Puffer to the Semifinals for the second time and first since 2014, guided by alum and previous assistant coach Langlois. The Rockets have won 12 straight games, including as well 4-3 in double overtime over Rockford in the Regional Semifinal. Stone and Stawski both earned all-state honorable mention last season. Junior forward Tyler Tindall (17 goals, 14 assists) and sophomore forward Eli Cuti (7/34) are among other offensive pacesetters, and sophomore goalie Huck VanDyke has a 1.75 GAA and stopped 91 percent of shots he’s faced.

Division 2

#1 BYRON CENTER
Record/rank: 25-2-1, No. 1
Coach: Jordan Steger, second season (52-4-1)
League finish: First in O-K Rue
Championship history: Division 2 runner-up 2023 and 2021.

Best wins: 4-2 over No. 4 Warren De La Salle Collegiate, 4-1 over Division 1 No. 6 Livonia Stevenson, 6-2 over Division 1 No. 9 Salem, 6-1 over Division 1 No. 5 Howell, 5-3 over Division 3 No. 4 Orchard Lake St. Mary’s, 10-0 over Saginaw Heritage.
Players to watch: Jackson Froysland, sr. F (33 goals, 40 assists); Braxton McKee, jr. F (21 goals, 24 assists); Cade Pratt, sr. F (32 goals, 50 assists).
Outlook: Byron Center graduated a significant portion of its offense from last season’s runner-up team that finished 28-2 and has equaled its performance in returning to the Semifinals. The Bulldogs’ only losses were on back-to-back days at the MIHL Showcase to Orchard Lake St. Mary’s and Detroit Catholic Central, the former in a shootout and latter only 3-1. Byron Center hasn’t given up a goal during the postseason, turning to senior Brady Swanson (1.59 GAA, .933 save %) most of the time in net. Ben Passeno (16 goals/14 assists) and Luke Philo (14/15) also are double-digit scorers, and 10 players have reached 10 assists.

#2 TRENTON
Record/rank: 22-4-2, No. 2
Coach: Chad Clements, 10th season (186-86-9)
League finish: First in MIHL Blue
Championship history: 14 MHSAA titles (most recent 2014), nine runner-up finishes.

Best wins: 3-2 over No. 6 White Lake Lakeland, 3-2 and 5-1 (Quarterfinal) over No. 7 Detroit U-D Jesuit, 4-0 over No. 9 Port Huron Northern, 5-2 over No. 3 Bloomfield Hills Brother Rice, 4-2 over No. 8 Allen Park, 4-3 (SO) over Division 1 No. 6 Livonia Stevenson, 3-2 (SO) over Division 3 No. 2 Marquette.
Players to watch: Will Barrett, sr. F (21 goals, 19 assists); Noah Miklos, sr. G (2.25 GAA, .920 save %); Owen McAlister, sr. D (1 goal, 11 assists).
Outlook: Trenton has won seven straight Regional championships and is back at the Semifinals after missing last year and finishing Division 2 runner-up in 2022. The Trojans are 9-0-1 over their last 10 games with six games scoring five or more goals during that streak and none giving up more than two. Junior Evan Sivi (1.32 GAA, .943 save %) has nearly split time in goal with Miklos, who made the all-state second team last season. Barrett also made the second team a year ago, and McAlister earned honorable mention. Senior defenseman Jay Cormier (11 goals/10 assists) and senior forward John Medvich (10/8) also are among leading scorers.

#3 WHITE LAKE LAKELAND
Record/rank: 22-5-1, No. 6
Coach: Tim Ronayne, 15th season (188-123-16)
League finish: First in Lakes Valley Conference
Championship history: Has never played in an MHSAA Final.

Best wins: 4-3 (2 OT) over No. 9 Port Huron Northern in Quarterfinal, 5-4 over No. 3 Bloomfield Hills Brother Rice in Regional Final, 4-3 and 8-1 over South Lyon, 4-1 over Rochester Hills Stoney Creek in Regional Semifinal, 3-1 over Saginaw Heritage.
Players to watch: Tim Hinkle, sr. F (22 goals, 16 assists); Austin Scanlon, soph. F (15 goals, 35 assists); Brennan Grant, sr. F (21 goals, 26 assists).
Outlook: Lakeland won its first Regional title since 2012 and has reached the Semifinals for the first time, all after a 1-3 start. The team is 21-2-1 since Dec. 1 and leaped into the headlines by eliminating reigning champion Brother Rice in the Regional Final. Four of the team’s five losses were to teams ranked at the end of the regular season. Hinkle, Grant and Scanlon make up the top line, and sophomore Nate Dell (15 goals/14 assists), junior Adam Trzcinski (13/14) and junior Ryan Danielson (14/9) are among other top contributors on the offensive end. Goalie Paul Baker is another high-performing senior, carrying a 1.73 GAA and .928 save percentage into this weekend.

#4 SAGINAW HERITAGE
Record/rank: 14-11, unranked
Coach: JJ Bamberger, 16th season (277-131-11)
League finish: Second in Saginaw Valley League
Championship history: Division 1 runner-up 2019 and 2018.

Best wins: 2-1 and 2-0 (Regional Final) over No. 5 Bay City, 8-2 and 3-2 (OT – Quarterfinal) over Midland, 4-3 over Division 3 No. 10 Grand Rapids Catholic Central.
Players to watch: Owen Turner, sr. D (17 goals, 20 assists); Owen Gohm, sr. F (21 goals, 27 assists); Alec Mellon, sr. F (23 goals, 25 assists).
Outlook: Heritage is making a return trip to the Semifinals and with nearly an identical record as last season, again after playing several top teams including four among this weekend’s field. The Hawks have heated up with seven wins over their last 11 games. Turner made the all-state first team last season. Senior Nolan Drapp (9 goals/25 assists) joins Gohm and Mellon on the top line, and junior defenseman Logan Boettcher (10/17) also has been a key scorer.

Division 3

#1 HOUGHTON
Record/rank: 24-2-2, No. 1
Coach: Micah Stipech, first season (24-2-2)
League finish: First in Great Lakes Hockey Conference
Championship history: Class B-C-D champion 1982, five runner-up finishes.

Best wins: 7-1 over No. 6 Sault Ste. Marie in Quarterfinal, 2-0 over No. 2 Marquette, 1-0, 4-1, 5-0 and 4-2 (Regional Final) over No. 5 Hancock; 4-2 over Division 1 No. 3 Hartland, 3-2 over Division 2 No. 2 Trenton, 4-3 over Division 2 No. 3 Bloomfield Hills Brother Rice, 5-1 over Division 2 No. 7 Detroit U-D Jesuit, 5-1 over Saginaw Heritage.
Players to watch: Connor Raffaelli, sr. D (9 goals, 26 assists); Bryant Lee, sr. G (1.07 GAA, .943 save %); Michael Maillette, sr. F (33 goals, 15 assists).
Outlook: By the numbers, Houghton stacks up nearly identically to when it made the trip a year ago – but is hoping for more after falling in a Semifinal to end that run. Stipech, a 1992 grad, took over the program this winter after seven seasons as an assistant and having taken part in three Finals weekends. Like last year, the Gremlins took on several of the state’s best on both peninsulas and lost only to DCC 2-1 and Green Bay Notre Dame Academy (Wis.). Raffaelli made the all-state first team last season, and Lee made the second. Connor Arko (13 goals, 28 assists), Jace DeForge (17/21) and Tanner Flachs (10/5) are others to watch in the offensive zone.

#2 EAST GRAND RAPIDS
Record/rank: 23-5, No. 3
Coach: Christopher Newton, sixth season (91-57-5)
League finish: First in O-K Baum
Championship history: Division 3 runner-up 2023 and 2002.

Best wins: 5-2 over No. 9 Flint Powers Catholic, 3-1 over No. 4 Orchard Lake St. Mary’s in Quarterfinal, 2-1 over No. 10 Grand Rapids Catholic Central in Semifinal, 4-1 over Division 1 No. 6 Livonia Stevenson, 5-2 over Division 1 No. 9 Salem, 5-2 over Division 1 No. 5 Howell, 5-0 over Division 1 No. 10 Grand Rapids Forest Hills Central.
Players to watch: Ian MacKeigan, sr. F (18 goals, 15 assists); Scotty Millman, sr. F (17 goals, 13 assists); Glenn Green, sr. F (10 goals, 22 assists).
Outlook: East Grand Rapids was one of the stories of the 2023 Finals, advancing to the championship game despite entering the postseason unranked. The Pioneers have won three straight Regional titles and four over the last six seasons, and added the first league title under Newton this winter. MacKeigan also was among the team’s leading scorers last season, as was senior Charlie Hoekstra (11 goals/15 assists). Juniors Oliver Owen (17/12) and James Albers (15/10) also find the net regularly, while senior Joe Green (1.55 GAA, .921 save %) has shined defending it.

#3 TRAVERSE BAY REPS
Record/rank: 18-8-2, No. 7
Coach: Mike Matteucci, sixth season (record N/A)
League finish: Does not play in a league.
Championship history: Has not played in an MHSAA Final.

Best wins: 5-2 over No. 3 East Grand Rapids, 5-0 over No. 10 Grand Rapids Catholic Central, 3-2 over Bloomfield Hills Cranbrook Kingswood, 4-1 over Division 1 No. 8 Northville.
Players to watch: Ethan Coleman, sr. F; Grand Lucas, sr. F; Ryan Lannen, sr. D (Statistics not submitted).
Outlook: Bay Reps are back at the Semifinals for the first time since 2019 and prepared against a loaded schedule as well, as all eight losses and two ties were to ranked teams – including a 3-3 draw with Division 2 top-ranked Byron Center. The cooperative includes players from several small schools in the northwestern Lower Peninsula, with Traverse City St. Francis the primary member. Lucas made the all-state first team last season, and Coleman and Lannen earned honorable mentions.

#4 BLOOMFIELD HILLS CRANBROOK KINGSWOOD
Record/rank: 14-13-1, unranked
Coach: John LaFontaine, fifth season (64-53-9)
League finish: Second in MIHL Blue
Championship history: 18 MHSAA titles (most recent 2021), two runner-up finishes.

Best wins: 2-0 and 3-0 over No. 3 Orchard Lake St. Mary’s, 3-2 over No. 10 Grand Rapids Catholic Central, 3-0 (Quarterfinal) and 3-2 over Riverview Gabriel Richard, 6-3 over Division 2 No. 9 Port Huron Northern.

Players to watch: Roman Cicco, sr. D (12 goals, 11 assists); Nick Timko, jr. F (13 goals, 16 assists), Michael Horton, sr. F (8 goals, 8 assists).
Outlook: One of the most successful programs in MHSAA history is back at the Semifinals after two seasons away and rebounding from a 7-18-2 finish just a year ago. Four losses this winter came to teams still playing this weekend and several of the rest to ranked opponents as the Cranes navigated a 2-4 start and have won seven of their last 10 games. Horton and Cicco are two of only four seniors on a team dominated by juniors and sophomores.

PHOTO Houghton's Wyatt Jenkins' (7) and Jace DeForge (15) celebrate winning the Great Lakes Hockey Conference title after playing Marquette to a 1-1 overtime tie on Feb. 16. (Photo by Cara Kamps.)