Software Development

August 8, 2014

In his book The Sports Gene, author David Epstein causes the reader to think about athletic performance as software more than hardware; and I believe this is even more important for us to consider in educational athletics.
In school sports, at least in most situations, we still believe that opportunity is for everybody, regardless of gene pool or body type. High school sports teams often have an eclectic mix-and-match look that defies each sport’s stereotype on other levels.
In school sports, coaches don’t select and sculpt the body type as much as welcome what comes to them and work to develop skills to overcome inherent shortcomings.
In school sports, we focus on the software more than the hardware on other levels as well.

We are concerned with character development more than physical development, on principles more than physiques. It’s the operating system we focus on, much more than the hardware.

We also judge success differently – more on intangibles than tangibles, more on heart and mind than trophies and medals.

    “Tournacation”

    February 9, 2018

    Here is one of several gold nuggets from Tom Farrey, executive director of the Aspen Institute, in a piece commissioned by the British Broadcasting Company and published in late December.

    A study by George Washington University found that what children wanted most from sport was the chance to play and to try their best, guided by a coach who respects them.

    Of the 81 reasons they gave for why sports were fun, “winning” came 48th, “playing in tournaments” 63rd, and “traveling to new places to play” 73rd.

    Children’s wishes, however, are not always put first, as parents compete to provide what they believe are the best opportunities.

    In the U.S., for instance, there may be no better example of the state of play than the growth of the “tournacation,” a term merging “tournament” and “vacation.”

    At one of the nation’s largest children’s football (soccer) tournaments, in rural New Jersey, a drone in flight is best positioned to see the scale of such an event.

    Up there, you can see the 75 pristine pitches that will host more than 600 teams of children aged nine to 14, chasing shiny balls, in shiny uniforms.

    The cars of thousands of parents mass at the playing fields’ edges.

    A two-day event such as this is an opportunity for organizers to make serious money, in this case up to $1,250 per team.

    That’s on top of travel and hotel costs of as much as $500 and the $3,000 or more many parents pay each year to their child’s club.

    It is an industry built on the wallets of parents, and the chase for opportunities to play in college, perhaps with a scholarship.

    What the drone can’t see is how many other children – those who aren’t early bloomers, or whose families don’t have the funds, or time, to take part – have fallen away from the game.

    They are often unable to join the best teams, which have the best coaches, training environments, and access to college scouts.

    Football (soccer) has declined among those left behind, with fewer children joining either local teams, or playing informal games in the park.

    Since 2011, the number of six- to 17-year-olds who play football (soccer) regularly has fallen nine percent to 4.2 million, according to the Sports and Fitness Industry Association.

    The number of children who touch a football (soccer ball) at least once a year, in any setting, was down 15 percent.

    For more, please click here.